Visit headinthegame's column >>

HEADINTHEGAME

Part Animal/Part Man
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 592; Links Seeded: 1834
Member Since: 9/2006

Vote for Candidates Who Distrust Government and Want To Limit It

advertisement

Remember Obama's comments about rural Americans clinging to their guns and bibles?

Its amazing how much that comment reveals about Obama and the Democratic party.

Now here comes Sarah Palin. She is what Obama was talking about! This is a woman who does cling to guns. Good for her! Guns will save America from Tyranny.

The Biden/Obama ticket, DailyKos, and the liberal machinery are now out to get her, to make sure America thinks she is unqualified and unfit to be Vice President. Why? Because they are elitists. They can't stomach the fact that a mother of five might have something to say, might be more competent than in fact they are. There is very much a sexism going on in this campaign to discredit Sarah Palin. A misogyny. She has more government experience than Obama!

No, Sarah Palin is not a member of the elite. She didn't grow up studying how government could make our lives better (thank god). But I'd rather have her in charge than someone who is itching to social engineer me.

The Democrats are all about social engineering.

The truth of the matter is that our government is out of control, at nearly all levels--spending, taxes, war, infringements of civil liberties. What does Obama propose to solve these problems? More government! More taxes! Now there is a solution that's bound to work.

The only way to solve out of control government is to cut back its power. But elitists don't believe in this. The believe that somehow they can harness the power of the government to do more good than bad. Its a foolish notion. The best thing to do with out of control government is start curtailing its power. Curtail its power to tax. Curtail its power to spy on Americans. etc.

We should start by firing whole classes of government employees, and wiping out as many government programs as possible. Let's start with the Department of Homeland Security.

If Obama turned his campaign back to what it threatened to be early in the campaign--a campaign against government rather than a campaign for it--he might have a chance this election cycle. He should pull a page from Ron Paul's playbook.

  • 8 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
3.1
1.1
{"commentId":2679666,"authorDomain":"headinthegame"}

As far as I can tell, Obama has proposed no dramatic curtailments of our government's power or the role it plays in our society. He favors government over private institutions. Government over the free market. Government over the right to bear arms. More taxes. More government. Less freedom.

{"commentId":2679666,"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366","authorDomain":"headinthegame"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":2680060,"authorDomain":"kaiji"}

The problem in America is that authoritarian tendencies are not noticed because while the groundwork has been laid, it's use has been thus far moderate: against fringe groups and scapegoats.

Another problem is the association of authoritarian governments with communism or dictatorships where it is obvious that people have no real power and dissent is punished by death. They live in the blissful assumption that all is well since no 'real Americans' are being rounded up and shot.

The other problem is the there is a genuine corrosion of respect for our countrymen.

Yeah, we may claim to be patriotic. But when the chips are down, too many of us rather use the heavy hand of government to coerce our way.

The only time rational fear of government seizes us is when the manifestations of what we oppose stand a chance of riding all that power we've so conveniently neglected to secure.

If we talk about the Democratic Party, we've come to expect more centralized government and more regulation.

But the biggest betrayal is the same trend from the Republican Party. Nobody has the guts to cut because it's political suicide.

A nanny state that 'protects' us from guns is no different than a nanny state that 'protects' us from drugs.

The chickens may as well pray for wolves to guard them from other wolves.

{"commentId":2680060,"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366","authorDomain":"kaiji"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
{"commentId":2680157,"authorDomain":"headinthegame"}

great comment Kaiji

{"commentId":2680157,"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366","authorDomain":"headinthegame"}
  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2682192,"authorDomain":"leogodin"}
Vote for Candidates Who Distrust Government and Want To Limit It

Unfortunately, we don't have any good options. Obama, McCain, and Bob Barr (the real Bob Barr not the newly libertarian leaning one) are all big government guys. I'm writing in Ron Paul.

{"commentId":2682192,"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366","authorDomain":"leogodin"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
{"commentId":2683264,"authorDomain":"partisanhack"}

No, Sarah Palin is not a member of the elite. She didn't grow up studying how government could make our lives better (thank god). But I'd rather have her in charge than someone who is itching to social engineer me.

The Democrats are all about social engineering.

Doesn't sound like she grew up studying much of anything - including how best to keep your daughters from getting pregnant at a too-early age.

The Democrats are for engineering effective government. Without it we're at the mercy of the ExxonMobils and Wal-Marts of the will, which love weak government because it means that they can call the shots on how you live instead fo the people of the United States of America.

We don't need any more government than is absolutely necessary, but we need a whole lot more GOOD government than we have now. We were promised that Bush's compassionate conservatism would show us how this could be done. Instead we've already paid hundreds of billions of dollars to pump up Halliburton's profits from the Iraq war while cheating our veterans out of good health care, even worse healthcare benefits than eight years ago - if that could be imagined - incredible cronyism in our government that has allowed untold billions to be flushed away into the hands of corrupt government contractors, the utterly inept handling of Katrina and any number of easily surfaced examples of how the conservative revolution is a fraud. For conservatives it's all about allowing them's that's got the gold to make the rules and keeping everyone else as ignorant as possible.

Americans deserve far better than this - and they will get better if they vote for Democrats in the fall.

{"commentId":2683264,"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366","authorDomain":"partisanhack"}
    Reply#4 - Mon Sep 1, 2008 4:24 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"345414","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"345414","contentId":"1812366"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking